Skip to main content
THE BORG
Convocations · v1
Triggered 30d0
Total Historical0
StateHEALTHY
SOVEREIGN SESSION

Convocations are rare and structural. They fire only when three or more councils across different divisions flag the same underlying issue. This is the architecture's escalation mechanism — when no single council can resolve a problem but the problem is real and persistent, the Sovereign convenes a Convocation.

// Trigger Conditions

3+
Three or more councils flag the same issue. Identity Keepers flags drift. Heretics challenges the same rule. Pattern-Spotters surfaces the same pattern. Three voices converge — Convocation triggers automatically.
!
Sovereign explicit call. Martin convenes a Convocation directly when a problem cuts across divisions but no single council can be assigned ownership. Rare. Reserved for the load-bearing moments.
Constitutional crisis. Heretics proposes amendment to a Constitutional law. Constitutional rejects. Heretics counter-proposes. Constitutional rejects again. Convocation auto-triggers to break the deadlock with Sovereign arbitration.

// Triggered Convocations — Last 30 Days

No Convocations triggered in last 30 days
This is the healthy state. The architecture is operating within normal council boundaries. Heretics challenges, Constitutional defends, Pattern-Spotters synthesises — but no single issue has aligned three councils against the architecture itself.

// Historical Convocations

No Convocations recorded since project inception
The first Convocation will be a significant moment. When it triggers, this page surfaces full deliberation — which councils flagged the issue, what the Sovereign decided, what changed in the architecture as a result.

// Deliberation Template — Shape of Future Convocations

When a Convocation triggers, deliberation follows a fixed shape across all three trigger types. The template below is the structural form — not a past event, not an example. It is the empty container the Sovereign will populate when the first Convocation fires.

Template A — Three-Council Convergence
01 · Trigger record — name the three councils that flagged the same issue. Cite the verdict file from each.
02 · Issue statement — one paragraph defining the systemic concern the three councils converged on.
03 · Each council's position — verbatim summary of why each flagged the issue, citing each council's own verdict.
04 · Cross-divisional debate — Constitutional Council position, Heretics Council position, any further council called by Sovereign.
05 · Sovereign verdict — Martin's decision and the reasoning. Locked into Modus/Councils/Verdicts/.
06 · Architectural amendment — what changed in the architecture as a result. Council added, killed, retrained, or scope shifted.
07 · Callback date — when to verify the amendment held.
no instances yet · convergence template activates on first 3-council alignment
Template B — Sovereign Explicit Call
01 · Sovereign brief — Martin defines the problem in his own words, names why no single council owns it.
02 · Councils convened — list of councils Sovereign called into the Convocation and the reasoning for each inclusion.
03 · Position from each convened council — written input, not real-time debate.
04 · Sovereign synthesis — Martin's reading of the council positions.
05 · Decision — locked verdict.
06 · Architectural amendment — what shifted.
07 · Callback date.
no instances yet · reserved for load-bearing cross-division moments
Template C — Constitutional Crisis
01 · Amendment proposal — Heretics Council's proposed change to a Constitutional law, with reasoning.
02 · Constitutional first rejection — Constitutional Council's defence, citing failure-mode insurance the law provides.
03 · Heretics counter-proposal — revised amendment.
04 · Constitutional second rejection — final structural defence.
05 · Sovereign arbitration — Martin's reading and decision. Either amends the law, retains the law, or routes to broader Convocation.
06 · Law text change — exact text of any amendment, locked to /laws/.
07 · Callback date.
no instances yet · activates on first Constitutional-Heretics deadlock